
(Last modified: Monday, April 28, 2008, 10:31 AM )
I'll use Maple syntax for mathematical notation on this page.
All section and page numbers refer to sections from Smith & Minton's Multivariable Calculus, 3rd edition.
Due Monday 4/28 at 9am
Section 14.4: Green's Theorem
JE, CN, and EL say (combining their answers):
What surprises me about Green's Theorem is that the (line) integral of Mdx + Ndy is the same as the (double) integral of Nx -My.That is, M is paired with dx on the line integral side but it's being partialed with respect to y on the double integral side, and the + in the line integral becomes a - on the double integral side.
CG says:
That you change a single (line) integral to a double integral is surprising.
BM adds:
What surprises me about Green's Theorem is that a baker with only two years of schooling can teach themselves mathematics and discover such a useful tool.
EP says:
An example of a region R that where Green's Theorem doesn't hold is the region bounded by x=2y^2-4, x=-2y^2 x=-4, x=4. The boundary is not simple as it is divides the region.
![]()
Due Friday 4/25 at 9am
Section 14.3: Independence of Path and Conservative Vector Fields
Reading questions:
EL says:
Conservative vector fields are helpful when evaluating line integrals because then the integral is independent of the path so you'll get the same result for any path you choose.
ZH says:
It makes calculating Line integrals very easy, and it is also almost exactly the same as the FT of Calculus.
Due Wednesday 4/23 at 9am
Section 14.2: Line Integrals (continued)
Reading questions:
DS says:
We can now find work if we use the component-wise line integrals.
MB says:
The orientation here does matter. If oriented incorrectly, the sign will change.
Due Monday 4/21 at 9am
Section 14.2: Line Integrals
Reading questions:
XZ, JE, and NA say:
The line integral (with respect to arclength) measures surface area. We can use it to find the mass of a spring or other thin curved object. It is also useful in center of mass problems.
JB says:
The orientation of the curve does not matter (for this type of line integral): the outcome will be the same either way, but the opposite orientation of a curve C is written -C.
Due Friday 4/18 at 9am
Section 14.1: Vector Fields
Reading questions:
CN says:
I think figure 14.3a most correctly shows the vector field, but that figure 14.3b gives you the best feel for the behavior of the vector field.

MB says:
If the leaf fell in at (-2,2.5), it would likely stay in the right-moving fast water that seems to be the main part of the river. Because it falls in at a higher y-value, it is not initially swept downwards on its journey.
EP says:
The leaf would flow down to the 3rd quadrant and into the fourth before turning up into the 1st quadrant.
Due Wednesday 4/16 at 9am
Section 13.5: Triple Integrals
Reading questions:
EL says:
Triple integrals are real handy if you're dealing with hypersurfaces for some reason, or if you're (probably) just working with three dimensions, you can use them to find the mass, volume, center of mass, etc. of an object.
ZH and KB say:
There are six different ways to write the triple iterated integrals!!! Also, of course, finding the limits of integration -- there are so many regions that you have to define.
Due Monday 4/14 at 9am
Section 13.4: Surface Area
Reading questions:
Combining answers from AM, NGP & BM:
In E & M physics you often calculate surface area of objects. You may want to compute surface area for the distribution of charge on a sphere.Engineers use SA all the time, for instance to use the least amount of material to make something.
NGP says;
Parallelograms
LD says:
The cross-product is used to find the area of the parallelogram that caps the function that we are trying to take the surface area of.
MB says:
The formula for surface area reminds me of the formula for arc length. Extending arc length to 2 dimensions does seem to be surface area.
Due Friday 4/11 at 9am
Section 13.3: Double Integrals in Polar Coordinates
Reading questions:
XZ says:
If it's in rectangular coordinates, the integration can cause lots of frustrations, if the region we want to integrate over is circular (in some way).
DS says:
dA = r*dr*dθ when integrating polar coordinates.
Due Monday 4/7 at 9am
Section 9.4: Polar Coordinates
Section 13.3: Double Integrals in Polar Coordinates
Reading questions:
MK says:
r=(sqrt(5^2+-2^2) = sqrt(29)arctan(-2/5)= -0.38 rads
So the polar coordinate is (sqrt(29), -0.38)
NGP says:
x=rcos(theta), y=rsin(theta)x=1(cos(pi/3))=1/2 y=1(sin(pi/3))≈(.866)
Rectangular coordinates are roughly (1/2,.866)
![]() | ![]() |
NA says:
sin(7θ)+5 corresponds to the first graph, and sin(7θ) cooresponds to the second graph.
Due Friday 4/4 at 9am
13.2: Area, Volume, and Center of Mass
Reading questions:
SR says:
∫∫R dA is the area of R ... 9Pi.
GW says:
My is used for the x coordinate of the center of mass.It is called My because it is the moment about the y-axis.Ę
Due Wednesday 4/2 at 9am
Section 13.1: Double Integrals (continued)
Reading questions:
In the double integral ∫∫Rf(x,y)dA,
JH says;
The dA represents that the double integral is taken with respect to area.
I add:
The dA can be thought of in two ways. In one sense, it simply tells you that you're integrating with respect to area. In another sense, however, you can think of it as an infinitesimally small area (coming from the region R). That multiplied by the height of the function f(x,y) give us the volume of an infinitesimally thin piece of our total volume. This is the infinitesimal analogy of the boxes we add up the volume of in the Riemann sum that lead to the definition of the double integral.
JE says:
They are their own symbol. Unlike the symbol used in Calc 1 and Calc 2, this symbol indicates the area under a function and above a region R. To represent this, we use a new symbol, rather than two of the old symbol, which indicate taking the area under a curve.
I add:
While Fubini's theorem tells us that one way we can actually calculate a double integral is to do it as nested integrals (one inside the other), that is a consequence, or a result ... not the definition of what a double integral is. A double integral is (signed) volume under a surface, and the double integral symbol is a single symbol, just as dA represents a tiny piece of area, NOT dxdy or dydx (although Fubini's theorem tells us we can replace dA with dxdy or dydx).
Due Monday 3/31 at 9am
Section 13.1: Double Integrals
Reading questions:
SR says:
It measures the volume lying beneath the surface z=f(x,y)and above the region R.
XZ says:
When taking the double the integral of f(x,y) over the region R={(x,y)|a≤x≤b and c≤y≤d}, we can either first integrate with respect to x followed by integrating with respect to y OR first integrate with respect to y followed by integrating with respect to x.
ZH adds:
Its purpose is to turn a double integral over a region into two integrals like one does in Calc 1.
Due Friday 3/28 at 9am
Section 12.7: Extrema of Functions of Several Variables (continued)
Reading questions:
ED says:
Pick a point. Move in the steepest direction (the direction of the positive gradient) until the slope stops being positive. Compute new gradient at that point. Move in the steepest direction until slope stops being positive. Keep doing this process until the difference between the starting point's and the gradientŐs steepness is insignificant.
Due Wednesday 3/26 at 9am
Section 12.7: Extrema of Functions of Several Variables
Reading questions:
EP says:
If the partials fx and fy exist everywhere, then f can have a local max or min when fx and fy=0.
BM says:
If fx(x0, y0))=fy(x0, y0)=0, and at that same point both fxx and fyy are positive, then we still need to know fxy to classify the critical point.
NGP adds:
If D(x0, y0) is greater than zero, then there is a local min at (x0, y0).
JB says:
(2,-1) will be a saddle point because:D= fxxfyy-(fxy)^2=3-6.25=-3.25, and if D<0 then f(a,b) is a saddle point.
Due Friday 3/21 at 9am
Section 12.6: The Gradient and Directional Derivatives (continued)
Reading questions:
..notice that a zero directional derivative at a point indicates that u is tangent to a level curve.Why is this true?
DS says:
This statement is true because level curves are curves in the xy-plane on which f is constant.
AM says:
It tells you the change in a quanity as you move in some direction from your current position.
BM adds:
the gradient allows you to find maximum and minimum rates of change of f(x,y).And AJ adds:
The gradient is orthogonal to the function, so it is a normal vector, useful when creating such things as tangent planes.
Due Wednesday 3/19 at 9am
Section 12.6: The Gradient and Directional Derivatives
Reading questions:
CN says:
Our choice of u must be a unit vector u1i+u2j.
NA says:
The gradient is a vector-valued function whose components are first order partial derivatives. With a surface in 3 dimensions the gradient will be in 2 dimensions.
(a) Compute Duf(2,1) for u=<-3/5,4/5>.CG says:
df/dx = 2xy = 4
df/dy = x^2 - 12y^2 = -8Duf(2,1)=<4, -8> * <-3/5,4/5> = -12/5 + -32/5 = -44/5
(b) Compute the gradient of f(x,y)
LD says:
(2xy,x^2-12y^2)
Due Friday 3/7 at 9am
Section 12.5: The Chain Rule
Reading questions:
JE says:
Using the tree diagram, there would be three branches coming from w=f(x,y,z), one for each variable's partial derivatives. From here, each variable becomes dependent on t, yielding three derivatives dependent on t. So, two steps of three partial derivatives are necessary to find ∂w/∂t (for a total of 6).
MK says:
∂w/∂t= (∂w/∂x)( ∂x/∂t) + (∂w/∂y)(∂y/∂t) + (∂w/∂z)(∂z/∂t)
Due Wednesday 3/5 at 9am
12.4: Tangent Planes and Linear Approximations
Reading questions:
ZH says:
The linear approximation would be horizontal (parallel to the xy plane)
EL adds:
If a linear approximation were to be taken at (a,b), it would always approximate f(x,y) as f(a,b) because fx(a,b)=fy(a,b)=0.
JH says:
If f(x,y)=xy^2 then fx = y^2 and fy = 2xy,
so at the point (2,3,18) we have fx = 9 and fy = 12so a normal vector is: <9, 12, -1>
EP says:
For L(x,y) to be accurate, the surface would have to be sloping very gradually. An inaccurate linear approximation would be one that quickly moves away from the tangent plane.
Due Friday 2/29 at 9am
Section 12.3: Partial Derivatives
Reading questions:
DS says:
fy(1,2) gives us the instantaneous rate of change in the y direction, at the point (1,2) on the function f.
AM says:
For f(x,y)=yexy, fx(x,y)=y2exy.
SR (and several others) say:
There are 6 second-order partial derivatives for f(x,y,z).
AJ (and several others) contend:
A function f(x, y, z) has 9 possible second-order partial derivatives: fxx, fxy, fxz, fyx, fyy, fyz, fzx, fzy, fzz.So ... which is it?
Monday 2/25 at 9am
Section 12.2: Limits and Continuity
Reading questions:
(a) Find the limit along the path x=0. That is, find lim(0,y)->(0,0) f(0,y).
JB says:
lim(0,y)->(0,0)f(0,y)= lim(0,y)->(0,0)(0/(0+y^2)) =lim(0,y)->(0,0)(0)=0(b) Find the limit along the path y=0. That is, find lim(x,0) -> (0,0) f(x,0).
MK says:
lim(x,0) -> (0,0) f(x,0)= lim (x,0) -> (0,0) (3x^2/(x^2+0) = 3(c) What -- if anything -- can you conclude from your results?
ED says:
Since the limit along the two paths donŐt match each other, the limit does not exist.
CN says:
This example is important because it shows that even if the limits along straight lines are the same, it does not necessarily mean that the limit exists. You have to choose some path that will cancel out the x's and y's, and then you will be able to see if it is still the same. Using something like the book does using "x=y^2", (which is obviously not a straight line) helps come to the conclusion that the limit does not exist.
MB says:
Limits are going to be important for understanding how taking derivatives of multivariable functions works, and applying this. The same ideas from Calc 2, like continuity and approximation, are probably equally useful in three dimensions (or higher).
Due Friday 2/22 at 9am
Section 12.1: Functions of Several Variables (continued)
Reading questions:
NGP says:
In the plane z=c, level curves are x^2/4 + y^2/9=c.When c > 0, they would be ellipses.
One equation could be x^2/4 + y^2/9=4, another x^2/4 + y^2/9=9.

LD says:
The graph has local extrema at (-pi/2,0) (0,pi/2) and (pi/2,0). I know this because this is where the centers for the ellipses that are on the graph are, and where other lines ripple out to.
EL adds:
The lines on the contour plot should be closer together when the derivative of z is large, and far apart when the derivative of z is small. Extrema should appear when the derivative of z equals 0, so where the lines are far apart. This happens at (Pi/2, 0), (-Pi/2, 0), and (0, Pi/2).
Due Wednesday 2/20 at 9am
Section 12.1: Functions of Several Variables
Reading questions:
| (a) | ![]() | (b) | ![]() |
| (c) | ![]() | (d) | ![]() |
EP says:
f1(x,y)=[(x2+y2)-2]3 matches up with graph d. The x^2 + y^2 means there will be circular cross sections parallel to the xy-plane. In the xz and yz trace, the graphs are cubics, matching up to graph d
CG says:
This is like a normal sine graph except the amount that the sine will equal is increasing exponentially in both directions.
Due Monday 2/18 at 9am
Section 11.6: Parametric Surfaces
Reading questions:
ED says:
Eliminate u parameter:JE suggested the following alternative approach:
x^2+y^2 = (2cos(u)sin(v))^2 + (2sin(u)sin(v))^2 = 4cos^2(u)sin^2(v) + 4sin^2(u)sin^2(v) = 4sin^2(v) (sin^2(u) + cos^2(u)) = 4sin^2(v) Next eliminate v parameter:
x^2+y^2+(z/3)^2 = 4sin^2(v) + (z/3)/^2 = 4sin^2(v) + [(6/3)cos(v)]^2 = 4sin^2(v) + (2cos(v))^2 = 4sin^2(v) + 4cos^2(v) = 4(sin^2(v) + cos^2(v)) = 4 x^2+y^2+(z/3)^2 = 4 => (x^2)/4+(y^2)4+(z^2)/36 = 1.
Therefore we have an ellipsoid
First step:
Notice that there are going to be some circular cross-sections.
Think: x^2 + y^2.
In this case, x^2 + y^2, when simplified, = 4sin^2(v).Next Step:
x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 4sin^2(v) + 36 cos^2(v).The RHS of this equation simplifies to 4 + 32cos^2(v).
Notice that 32 cos^2(v) is the same as (8/9)z^2.This can be rewritten as x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 4 + (8/9)z^2.
Simplified: x^2 + y^2 + z^2/9 = 4.
- In Example 6.3, what might make you think to use cosh(u) and sinh(u) in the parametric equations for x and y? That is, what property that's useful in this situation do they have?
KB says:
cosh^2(u)-sinh^2(u)=1 is a useful property to simplify the equation in order to get a hyperbolic paraboloid.
Due Wednesday 2/13 at 9am
Section 10.6: Surfaces in Space
Reading questions:
Consider the surface x=4y2+4z2.
GW says:
The xy plane.
JH says:
" In the x-z plane" -> y = 0 -> x = 4z^2, which is a parabola.
ZH says:
k=4y^2+4z^2 => k/4=y^2+z^2 => (sqrt(k)/2)^2=y^2+z^2These are circles with increasing radii as k increases of the form: sqrt(k)/2
BM says:
The surface is a circular parabloid
Due Monday 2/11 at 9am
Section 11.5: Tangent and Normal Vectors
Reading questions:
DS says:
The unit tangent is straight ahead of me, in the direction that I am going at that instant. The principle unit normal is 90 degrees to my left, in the direction of the center of the curve.
Due Friday 2/8 at 9am
Section 11.4: Curvature
Reading questions:
JB says:
Curvature is how sharp a turn on a curve is, or how much a curve turns within a certain unit of length.
MB says:
The change in the z coordinate will affect the curvature of the helix. As t increases, there will be more and more stretching of the helix, as the squared z coordinate will result in a greater height increase per spiral of the helix.
Due Wednesday 2/6 at 9am
Problem Set Guidelines
Section 11.3: Motion in Space
Reading questions:
NGP says:
r'(t) tells you the object's velocity at time t, and the magnitude of r'(t) is the speed of the object.
SR says:
v(t)=r'(t)= <-5/2sqrt(t^3), 3/t, -3sec^2(3t)>
a(t)=r''(t)=<15/4sqrt(t^5), - 3/t^2, -18sec^2(3t)tan(3t)>
Due Monday 2/4 at 9am
Section 11.2: The Calculus of Vector-Valued Functions
AJ says:
r'(t) = <-t*sin(t) + cos(t), 2t*exp(t^2), 1/t> by the usual differentiation rules.
EP says:
r'(a) gives the tangent vector to the curve c at the point corresponding to t=a for the vector-valued function r(t)XZ adds:
If r(t) is on a interval I, the curve traced by the vector-valued function r(t) is smooth if r' is continuous on I and r'(t) is not equal 0, except possibly at any endpoints of I.
(a) What do the graphs of r(t) and s(t) look like?
MK says:
For r(t), the parametric equations are:
x = cos(t), y = sin(t).x^2+y^2 = cos^2(t)+sin^2(t) = 1, so, x^2+y^2 = 1
=> A circle centered at the origin, with radius = 1For s(t), the parametric equations are:
x = sin(5t), y = cos(5t).x^2+y^2 = sin^2(5t)+cos^2(5t) = 1, so x^2+y^2 = 1
=> A circle centered at the origin, with radius = 1Therefore, the graphs will look alike because they have the same equation x^2+y^2 = 1.
(b) If the graphs of two vector-valued functions r(t) and s(t) are the same, must r'(0)=s'(0)? (Is this a new result, or was it also true for functions f(x) and g(x)?)
MB says:
Because the derivative of a vector valued function is a vector, and not a slope, there is the potential for similar-looking graphs of two functions to have different derivatives. This differs from functions such as f(x) and g(x).
Due Friday 2/1 at 9am
Section 11.1: Vector-Valued Functions
Reading questions:
(a) Using Example 1.2 as a guide, what will the graph of this function look like?
XZ says:
x = cos(t), y = sin(t)
=> x^2 + y^2 = cos^2(t) +sin^2(t)
=> x^2 + y^2 = 1It is a circle with radius = 1, centered at the origin.
(b) Is it possible to rewrite r(t) as a function y=f(x)?
CN says:
It is not a function. It is possible to rewrite r(t) as two functions y=f(x), one positive, and one negative.
ZH and AJ say:
Some advantages of using vector valued functions include:
- Extraordinarily complex functions in Cartesian coordinates can be made much easier. This is especially true for 3D cases where the equations in xy can get scary.
- With vector-valued functions you can create things that cannot be created with a function y = f(x).
- Since vectors and parametric equations are so similar, the notation used for vectors provides a GREAT way of creating vector equations that is more compact.
Due Wednesday 1/30 at 9am
Section 9.1: Plane Curves and Parametric Equations Section 10.5: Lines and Planes in Space
Reading questions:
KB says:
x-1= - 6t y-2=3t z-3=3t
BM says:
To determine the equation of a plane you need either a point and a normal vector, three pts, or a point and a parallel plane.
EL says:
3(x-1)+0(y-2)-1(z-3) = 0 -> 3x-z = 0
Reminder:
Due Monday 1/28 at 9am
Problem Set Guidelines
Section 10.4: The Cross Product
Section 10.5: Lines and Planes in Space
Reading questions:
MK says:
No, because the cross product is not associative.
CG says:
If the cross product is zero then they are parallel. If the dot product is zero they are orthogonal.
JB says:
In order to find an equation for a line L, we need to have either two points on the line, or we must know one point on the line and the direction of the line.
NA says:
Parametric equations are:
x-1=3t
y-2=0t
z-3= -1t
Due Friday 1/25 at 9am
guidelines for submitting reading assignments
suggestions for reading a math text
course policies
syllabus
Section 10.1: Vectors in the Plane
Section 10.2: Vectors in Space
Section 10.3: The Dot Product
Section 10.4: The Cross Product
Reading questions:
LD says:
||<-2,3,-6>|| = sqrt[(-2)^2+(3)^2+(-6)^2] = sqrt(49) = 7u = (1/7)*<-2,3,-6> = <(-2/7),(3/7),(-6/7)>
(a) Find a.b.
JE says:
a.b.= 8+(-10)+(-3)= -5(b) Does (a.b).c make sense, and if so, what is it in this case?
AJ says:
No because you can't do a dot product with the scalar that results from a . b.(c) Are b and c orthogonal?
ED says:
<4,10,-1> * <3,-1,2> = 12-10-2 = 0. Therefore b and c are orthogonal, because b.c = 0
JH says:
projba is the projection of a onto b, meaning the vector that is parallel to b and has the same component as a along b. compba is the magnitude of the segment formed when a perpendicular line is dropped from vector a onto the line of vector b.
AM says:
axb is a vector in V3 which is perpendicular to both a and b.
EP says:
a x b is not defined in V2. The cross product does not work for vectors in V2. If it was set up using a matrix, it would not be able to be set up and calculated out.